Best NVMe SSDs in 2026 — Samsung 990 Pro vs WD SN850X vs Crucial T705

  • #SSD
  • #NVMe
  • #storage
  • #Samsung 990 Pro
  • #WD SN850X
  • #Crucial T705
  • #PCIe 5.0
NVMe SSDs comparison — Samsung, WD and Crucial

Introduction

The NVMe SSD market in 2026 is split into two camps: mature, proven PCIe 4.0 drives that deliver excellent performance at reasonable prices, and new PCIe 5.0 drives offering 12,000+ MB/s sequential reads at 2–3× the cost. For gamers, the honest answer is that PCIe 5.0 provides zero measurable benefit over a good PCIe 4.0 drive in gaming. But for content creators, professionals, and PC enthusiasts who move large files frequently, PCIe 5.0 can save meaningful time.

In this roundup we test six SSDs across three price tiers: Budget (~$60), Mid-range (~$90), and Premium (~$150+). We measure sequential read/write speeds, random IOPS, real-world game load times (DayZ, ARC Raiders, Cyberpunk 2077), thermal throttling behavior, and endurance ratings.

SSDs Tested

Drive Interface Controller NAND Capacity Price (1 TB)
WD Black SN770 PCIe 4.0 x4 WD in-house TLC 1 TB / 2 TB $65
Kingston NV3 PCIe 4.0 x4 Maxio MAP1602 TLC 1 TB / 2 TB $55
Samsung 990 Pro PCIe 4.0 x4 Samsung Elpis Samsung V-NAND TLC 1 TB / 2 TB / 4 TB $90
WD Black SN850X PCIe 4.0 x4 WD in-house TLC 1 TB / 2 TB / 4 TB $105
Crucial T705 PCIe 5.0 x4 Phison E26 Micron 232L TLC 1 TB / 2 TB / 4 TB $160
Samsung 9100 Pro PCIe 5.0 x4 Samsung in-house Samsung V-NAND TLC 1 TB / 2 TB / 4 TB $185

Sequential Read / Write Performance

Drive Seq. Read (MB/s) Seq. Write (MB/s) Interface
Kingston NV3 1 TB 3,500 2,800 PCIe 4.0
WD Black SN770 1 TB 5,150 4,900 PCIe 4.0
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB 7,450 6,900 PCIe 4.0
WD Black SN850X 1 TB 7,300 6,600 PCIe 4.0
Crucial T705 1 TB 13,600 10,200 PCIe 5.0
Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB 14,800 13,400 PCIe 5.0

Random 4K Read / Write (IOPS)

Random IOPS matter more than sequential speed for most real-world workloads, including game loading, OS responsiveness, and database access. Higher is better.

Drive Random Read (K IOPS) Random Write (K IOPS)
Kingston NV3 1 TB 380K 520K
WD Black SN770 1 TB 740K 800K
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB 1,400K 1,550K
WD Black SN850X 1 TB 1,200K 1,100K
Crucial T705 1 TB 1,500K 1,800K
Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB 1,600K 1,900K

Real-World Game Load Times

We measured loading from game launch to main menu (cold) and from death/menu back into the game (warm, OS file cache active). All tests done 5× and averaged.

Drive DayZ (cold) DayZ (warm) ARC Raiders (cold) Cyberpunk 2077 (cold)
Kingston NV3 1 TB 38.2 s 12.4 s 22.8 s 41.5 s
WD Black SN770 1 TB 28.5 s 9.8 s 16.2 s 30.4 s
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB 22.1 s 8.2 s 13.5 s 24.8 s
WD Black SN850X 1 TB 23.4 s 8.5 s 14.1 s 25.6 s
Crucial T705 1 TB 21.8 s 7.9 s 13.1 s 24.1 s
Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB 21.2 s 7.8 s 12.8 s 23.5 s

Key insight: The PCIe 5.0 drives (T705, 9100 Pro) offer only 0.6–0.9 second faster cold load times compared to the Samsung 990 Pro. The difference between cheap (NV3) and mid-range (990 Pro) is 16 seconds — that's where the money is actually well spent.

Thermal Performance

NVMe SSDs run hot under sustained load, and thermal throttling can dramatically reduce performance. We ran a 10-minute sequential write workload and monitored temperatures.

Drive Idle Temp Peak Temp (10 min write) Throttling? Heatsink Needed?
Kingston NV3 38°C 62°C Mild No
WD Black SN770 35°C 65°C No No
Samsung 990 Pro 38°C 68°C No No
WD Black SN850X 40°C 72°C No No (included pad helps)
Crucial T705 48°C 88°C Yes — significant Yes — required
Samsung 9100 Pro 45°C 82°C Mild Recommended

Warning for PCIe 5.0 users: Both the T705 and 9100 Pro throttle significantly without active cooling. The Crucial T705 dropped from 13,600 MB/s to 6,200 MB/s after 4 minutes of sustained writes without a heatsink. Always use the motherboard M.2 heatsink or a standalone one with PCIe 5.0 drives.

Endurance and Warranty

Drive TBW (1 TB) Warranty MTBF
Kingston NV3 1 TB 480 TBW 3 years 1.5M hours
WD Black SN770 1 TB 600 TBW 5 years 1.75M hours
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB 600 TBW 5 years 1.5M hours
WD Black SN850X 1 TB 600 TBW 5 years 1.75M hours
Crucial T705 1 TB 600 TBW 5 years 1.8M hours
Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB 600 TBW 5 years 2.0M hours

DirectStorage and Shader Compilation

Microsoft's DirectStorage API allows games to stream assets directly from SSD to GPU memory, bypassing the CPU. This dramatically reduces CPU stutter and can improve load times in future titles designed for it. As of 2026, few games fully implement DirectStorage, but ARC Raiders uses a partial implementation.

Drive ARC Raiders DirectStorage Level Load
WD Black SN770 4.8 s
Samsung 990 Pro 3.2 s
WD Black SN850X 3.4 s
Crucial T705 2.1 s
Samsung 9100 Pro 1.8 s

DirectStorage is where PCIe 5.0 begins to show a real advantage. As more games adopt it (likely standard by 2027–2028), the investment in a fast PCIe 5.0 drive becomes more justified.

Our Picks by Use Case

Use Case Recommended Drive Why
Budget gaming (best value) WD Black SN770 ($65) Fast enough, 5-year warranty, reliable
Gaming sweet spot Samsung 990 Pro ($90) Best random IOPS in PCIe 4.0, proven reliability
Gaming + content creation WD Black SN850X ($105) Slightly better sustained writes, excellent all-around
Future-proof / pro workstation Crucial T705 ($160) PCIe 5.0 for DirectStorage + large file transfers
PS5 compatible WD Black SN850X Sony-certified, fits PS5 M.2 slot with optional heatsink

Pros and Cons

Samsung 990 Pro — Pros

  • Best random IOPS of any PCIe 4.0 drive
  • Excellent thermal management — rarely throttles
  • Samsung's Magician software for monitoring and optimization
  • Available in 1 TB, 2 TB, and 4 TB
  • Consistent real-world performance, no gotchas

Samsung 990 Pro — Cons

  • $90 vs. $65 for WD SN770 — 38% premium for ~10% real-world gain
  • Earlier firmware had power usage bugs (fixed in 2024)

Crucial T705 (PCIe 5.0) — Pros

  • Highest sequential speeds available — 13,600 MB/s read
  • Best DirectStorage performance for future games
  • Excellent for large file transfers (video production, VM images)
  • 5-year warranty, 600 TBW

Crucial T705 (PCIe 5.0) — Cons

  • Requires PCIe 5.0 M.2 slot (Z790, X670E motherboards)
  • Extreme thermal throttling without heatsink
  • $160 vs. $90 for 990 Pro with minimal gaming benefit today
  • Higher idle power draw

Watch Reviews

Frequently Asked Questions

Does a faster SSD improve in-game FPS?

No — once assets are loaded into RAM and VRAM, the SSD speed has zero impact on in-game framerates. A faster SSD only reduces load times and texture pop-in, not FPS during gameplay.

How much storage do I need for gaming in 2026?

Modern games are large: DayZ ~60 GB, ARC Raiders ~80 GB, Cyberpunk 2077 ~70 GB, Call of Duty ~150 GB. A 1 TB drive fits about 10–15 games. A 2 TB drive is the sweet spot — prices have dropped to $110–$130 for mid-range 2 TB PCIe 4.0 drives.

Is my old SATA SSD still acceptable?

Yes, for most tasks. SATA SSDs (550 MB/s max) are 5–10× slower than NVMe but game load times are only 20–40% longer than a budget NVMe. A 7-year-old SATA SSD is not worth replacing purely for gaming unless it's nearly full.

Do I need a heatsink for my NVMe SSD?

For PCIe 4.0 drives: most motherboard heatsinks are adequate. For PCIe 5.0 drives: a heatsink is mandatory to maintain rated performance. The M.2 heatsinks included on most modern motherboards are sufficient for PCIe 4.0.

Conclusion

For gaming, the Samsung 990 Pro at $90 is the best NVMe SSD you can buy in 2026. Its combination of 7,450 MB/s sequential reads, best-in-class random IOPS, excellent thermals, and Samsung's proven reliability make it the clear winner for the price. The PCIe 5.0 drives (T705, 9100 Pro) deliver their headline numbers only with adequate cooling and provide minimal gaming benefit today — but they're a reasonable investment if you transfer large files frequently or want to be ahead of DirectStorage.

Best value pick: WD Black SN770 ($65) — excellent for budget builds.
Best overall: Samsung 990 Pro ($90) — the sweet spot of performance and reliability.
Best premium: Crucial T705 ($160) — only if you need PCIe 5.0 speeds.